Knowing we were building a custom interior space, I felt it was necessary to begin by building it around the user as a focal point. Features and hardware were to be worked and reworked to prioritize the user’s ability and preference. People of all sizes were used as reference, recording their size, reach, and many other aspects.

It is from this data that a truly ‘customized’ user space was established and standard guidelines built for future reference. For example - a size range for the desktop that ensured workable space in tandem with measurement for how much room the user needs to comfortably arrive at and sit at their desk. This assisted in the development of a sizable footprint with consideration for the user’s ability to reach features like electronics, controls, or their belongings.

Using the limitation of our plywood - 48” - as constraints for the width, a footprint was established as a foundation to build the unit from. Looking at existing products on the market, true privacy was chosen as a distinctive element for the product. (more info on competetive analysis)

Carefully selected members of our internal focus group were used to validate ergonomic decisions. Chosen for their variety of stature, occupation, and perspective, they proved to be crucial for ensuring the space did not exclude any type of person from taking advantage of it.

Every conceivable angle was tested and retested in order to unlock the nuance of fitting a person comfortably into the small space. Our priorities were ease of access, ample workspace, and a nice view.

The challenge was the footprint. 48” side to side to fit a frame, trim, dressing, hardware, electronics… Every inch on every side was important. Adding space to seating took away from the desk space. Taking away wall thickness reduces sound blockage. Each element had to be balanced against the space it occupied and its benefit to the user.

In a clarifying way, nothing unnecessary could be permitted.